Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (8): 902-908.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.20240182

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Database and Evaluation Methods for Chinese Herb-Drug Interactions

SHEN Chen1, ZHOU Xian2, LIU Jianping1*   

  1. 1Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China;
    2NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead 2145, Australia
  • Received:2024-03-19 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-13

Abstract: Objective To outline the commonly used databases and evaluation methods for Herb-Drug Interactions (HDIs) and explore ways to evaluate Chinese Herbal-Drug Interactions (CHDIs). Methods CNKI and PubMed were searched for related literature published from inception to March 19, 2024. The HDI database, causal inference, evidence grading and quality assessment, as well as methods for evaluation of clinical relevance were summarized. Results Clinical decision support (CDS) systems required all-round assessment of the quality grading of evidence, clinical relevance, risk factors and adverse reactions. The DIPS scale could be used to evaluate the causality between HDIs and adverse events, but there was no specific method for evaluating the quality of evidence and clinical relevance of HDIs. Conclusion The methods for evaluating the quality of drug interactions and the evaluation system for evidence of Chinese herbal medicine need to be consulted to establish an evidence evaluation system and CDS tool for CHDIs.

Key words: Chinese Herb-Drug Interaction, Database, Causal Inference, Evidence Quality, Clinical Correlation

CLC Number: