中国药物警戒 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12): 1321-1327.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.20250485

• 专家论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

拉沙热抗病毒药物临床应用研究进展

王冉冉, 马瑞泽, 陈志海*   

  1. 传染病溯源预警与智能决策全国重点实验室,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院,北京 100015
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-23 发布日期:2025-12-19
  • 通讯作者: *陈志海,男,主任医师,教授·博导,感染性疾病。E-mail: chenzhihai0001@126.com; 陈志海,主任医师,教授,博士生导师,国家级人才项目获得者。首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院感染性疾病中心主任,国家疾控局传染病标准专业委员会委员,中华医学会感染病学分会常委,中华医学会热带病与寄生虫学分会常委,中华医学会北京分会感染专业委员会副主任委员,北京预防医学会感染病学专委会副主任委员,中西医协同感染病旗舰科室主任。致力于各种急性传染病临床诊治研究30余年,作为国家卫生健康委员会、北京市卫健委专家参加全国各种重大传染病疫情处置。《中国药物警戒》期刊编委。
  • 作者简介:王冉冉,女,在读硕士,感染性疾病。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFF1203201)

Research Progress in Clinical Applications of Antiviral Drugs for Lassa Fever

WANG Ranran, MA Ruize, CHEN Zhihai*   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
  • Received:2025-07-23 Published:2025-12-19

摘要: 目的 综述拉沙热(Lassa Fever,LF)抗病毒药物研究进展,为突破当前治疗瓶颈提供参考。方法 通过检索PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网等数据库,归纳法维拉韦、利巴韦林及免疫治疗的临床应用效果,并总结具有潜力的小分子药物的作用机制。结果 法维拉韦、利巴韦林和免疫治疗均表现出一定的疗效,利巴韦林联合法维拉韦或地塞米松在临床中已有救治成功的案例。国内外针对利巴韦林的使用剂量及疗程存在争议,且现有证据不足以支持常规使用利巴韦林治疗LF。法维拉韦的心脏安全性也仍需进一步评估。多种小分子抑制剂也显示出广阔的临床应用前景。结论 目前全球范围内尚无获批的特异性抗拉沙病毒(Lassa Virus,LASV)药物,但针对病毒生命周期不同环节的多种候选药物研究已取得显著进展,联合用药及多靶点治疗的策略将成为未来的重要研究方向。

关键词: 拉沙热, 拉沙病毒, 抗病毒药物, 免疫治疗, 小分子抑制剂, 研究进展

Abstract: Objective To summarize recent advances in antiviral drugs for Lassa fever (LF) and provide insights into current therapeutic bottlenecks. Methods Such databases as PubMed, Web of Science and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for literature about the clinical efficacy of favipiravir, ribavirin, and immunotherapy, as well as the mechanisms of promising small-molecule drugs. Results Favipiravir, ribavirin, and immunotherapy all proved to be effective against LF. Desirable outcomes resulted from ribavirin in combination with either favipiravir or dexamethasone. However, the appropriate dosage of ribavirin and course of treatment remained controversial, and there was too little evidence to recommend ribavirin for routine treatment of LF. Moreover, the cardiac safety of favipiravir needed to be assessed. However, a variety of small-molecule inhibitors promised wide applications. Conclusion Although no specific antiviral drug has been approved globally for the treatment of LASV, significant progress has been made in developing candidate therapeutics that target different stages of the viral life cycle. Combination therapy and multi-target strategies will be priorities of subsequent research.

Key words: Lassa Fever, Lassa Virus, Antiviral Drugs, Immunotherapy, Small-Molecule Inhibitor, Research Progress

中图分类号: