Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (11): 1315-1320.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.20250189

Previous Articles    

Safety of Long-Term Oral Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B

ZHU Haomin1, LI Yue2, ZHANG Mengdie1, GAO Lihong1, WANG Jia1, LI Xin1*, TAO Tiantian1#   

  1. 1School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Jiangsu 211166, China;
    2School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing Jiangsu 211198, China
  • Received:2025-03-27 Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-14

Abstract: Objective To explore the safety of long-term oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to provide references for clinical practice. Methods By analyzing drug inserts, results of clinical trials, data on post-marketing surveillance and real-world cohort data, the risks of nephrotoxicity, bone toxicity, and dyslipidemia were compared between entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF). Results NAs were generally safe, but chronic use might lead to decreased renal function, hypophosphatemia and dyslipidemia. TAF and TMF caused significantly lower nephrotoxicity and bone toxicity than TDF, but were associated with a higher risk of hyperlipidemia. Conclusion NAs should be selected based on differences between individual patients. TAF/TMF is the first option for patients with renal insufficiency or at high risk of bone metabolism. For patients with cardiovascular risks or dyslipidemia, TAF/TMF should be used with caution.

Key words: Chronic Hepatitis B, Nucleos(t)ide Analogues, Nephrotoxicity, Bone Toxicity, Dyslipidemia

CLC Number: