Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 614-620.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.20250078

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimization of a Determination Method for Aflatoxins in Polygalae Radix

LU Yu1,2, FENG Weihong1, CHENG Boyu1, DAI Mengru1, LU Chenna1, QIAO Lingzhi1, ZHANG Yongxin1, LIU Xiaoqian1, LIANG Yaohua1, LI Yanrong3, SUN Xiaoli2#, LI Chun1*   

  1. 1Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, National Engineering Laboratory for Quality Control Technology of Chinese Herbal Medicines, Beijing 100700, China;
    2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Beijing City University, Beijing 100094, China;
    3Department of Pharmacy, the Fifth Hospital of Yulin City, Yulin Shaanxi 719000, China
  • Received:2025-02-11 Published:2025-06-18

Abstract: Objective To establish a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for simultaneous determination of contents of four aflatoxins in Polygalae Radix medicinal materials. Methods An Ultimate XB-C18 column (4.6 mm×150 mm, 5 μm) was used as the stationary phase with methanol (A)-acetonitrile (B)-water (C) (22∶10∶68) as the mobile phase. The flow rate was 0.7 mL·min-1 and the column temperature 40°C. A fluorescence detector (λex=360 nm, λex=450 nm) was adopted, and the injection volume was 10 μL. The effects of extraction and purification were compared between different methods of extraction and between immunoaffinity columns of different brands. The pretreatment process was optimized, and the difference that matrix effects made in detection results was investigated. The aflatoxin levels of 28 batches of Polygalae Radix herbs and decoction pieces were tested. Results The results of the methodological investigation met the requirements of quality analysis of traditional Chinese medicine. AFG2 and AFB2 showed a good linear relationship within the range of 0.000 075 to 0.075 μg·mL-1, compared to 0.000 25 to 0.25 μg·mL-1 for AFG1 and AFB1.The correlation coefficients were 0.999 9. The matrix effect ranged from 94.49% to 103.51%, indicating that the Polygalae Radix matrix had no significant impact on the determination of aflatoxins. The average recovery of AFG2, AFG1, AFB2, and AFB1 at low, medium and high concentrations was 78.98% to 93.51%, 81.88% to 100.74%, and 82.19% to 116.12%, respectively, with RSDs ranging from 1.1% to 6.6%. For Polygalae Radix, a homogenizer was a better means to extract aflatoxins before enriching them with the immunoaffinity columns. Among the 28 batches of Polygalae Radix samples, 2 batches of crude drugs were found to be substandard. The highest total content of aflatoxins was 313.63 μg·kg-1 and the AFB1 content was as high as 143.27 μg·kg-1. Conclusion A simple and reliable new method for simultaneous determination of four aflatoxins in Polygalae Radix medicinal materials has been established, which can overcome the flaws of existing detection methods currently available and expose the risk of aflatoxin contamination in Polygalae Radix.

Key words: Polygalae Radix, Aflatoxins, High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Fluorescence Detector, Matrix Effects

CLC Number: