中国药物警戒 ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 50-51.

• 安全性评价与合理用药 • 上一篇    下一篇

延长输注比阿培南治疗重症肺炎的疗效与药物经济学分析

栗兰,李明艳,赖军华   

  1. 广西医科大学第四附属医院 ,广西 柳州 545005
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-02 修回日期:2016-02-25 出版日期:2016-01-08 发布日期:2016-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 李明艳,女,本科,副主任药师,医院药学。
  • 作者简介:栗兰, 女, 本科, 药师, 医院药学。
  • 基金资助:
    广西柳州市科协软科学研究项目( 桂科协软20140107);广西卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z2015164)。

Clinical Efficacy and Pharmacoeconomics Evaluation of Extended-infusion of Biapenem in Treatment of Severe Pneumonia

LI Lan, LI Ming-yan, LAI Jun-hua   

  1. 4 th Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Liuzhou 545005, China
  • Received:2015-11-02 Revised:2016-02-25 Online:2016-01-08 Published:2016-02-25

摘要: 目的 考察微泵输注比阿培南延长给药时间治疗重症肺炎的疗效与安全性 ,并进行药物经济学评价。方法 58例重症肺炎患者随机分为 3 h延长输注组 (EI组 )和 0.5 h短时间输注组 (TI组 ),分别给予比阿培南 0.3 g, q12 h~q6 h,比较两组治疗效果 ,并应用最小成本法进行药物经济学分析。 结果EI组有效率为 63.33%,平均成本为 (4 057±296)元 ; TI组有效率为 60.71% ,平均成本为 (5 624±308)元 ,EI组治疗成本明显低于 TI组 ( P<0.05)。结论 延长输注比阿培南治疗重症肺炎具有显著的药物经济学优势 ,值得推广应用。

关键词: 比阿培南, 延长输注, 重症肺炎

Abstract: Objective To study the efficacy and economic benefit of extended-infusion of biapenem in treatment of severe pneumonia. Methods 58 patients were divided into 3 h extended-infusion group (EI) and 0.5 h intermit-infusion group (TI), given biapenem 0.3 g, q12 h~q6 h, respectively.The clinical effect was compared, and the pharmacoeconomics was analyzed by the least cost analysis. Results The effective rate of EI group was 63.33%, and the average cost was ( 4 057±296) yuan. The effective rate of TI group was 60.71%, the average cost was (5 624±308 ) yuan. The cost of EI group was significantly lower than that of the TI group (P <0.05). Conclusion It has prominent superiority for extended-infusion of biapenem to treat severe pneumonia, deserving of popularization and application.

Key words: biapenem, extended-infusion, pharmacoeconomics

中图分类号: