中国药物警戒 ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10): 1139-1143.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.20260407

• 安全与合理用药 • 上一篇    下一篇

中药“十八反”源流考辨及现代阐释

杨玉琴1, 郎英琦2△, 王敏舒1, 吴美玲1#, 柏冬1*   

  1. 1中国中医科学院中医基础理论研究所,北京 100700;
    2北京中医药大学东直门医院血液肿瘤科,北京 100010
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-21 出版日期:2026-10-15 发布日期:2026-10-16
  • 通讯作者: *柏冬,男,博士,研究员·博导,中药药效物质基础研究。E-mail: baidong20000@126.com。#为共同通信作者。
  • 作者简介:杨玉琴,女,博士,助理研究员,中药药效物质基础研究。△为并列第一作者。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(82204600);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金资助(YZX-202401、CYZ-202512);中国中医科学院青年科技人才培养专项(ZZ17-YQ-032)

The origin and modern interpretation of the eighteen incompatibilities in traditional Chinese medicine

Yang Yuqin1, Lang Yingqi2△, Wang Minshu1, Wu Meiling1#, Bai Dong1*   

  1. 1Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China;
    2Department of Hematology and Oncology, Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100010, China
  • Received:2026-05-21 Online:2026-10-15 Published:2026-10-16

摘要: 目的 探讨中药临床用药安全核心概念“十八反”内涵,构建现代理论解释框架,为中医药临床安全用药与配伍规律深化研究提供参考。方法 通过文献考证与语义辨析探析“反”字源流;结合实证分析与系统评价,整合现代药典规范、临床试验及基础实验研究,剖析“证候微环境”下反药毒–效转化机制。结果 拟定涵盖体质辨识、剂量阈值及配伍佐制等多维度临床条件适用决策树模型。研究表明,“十八反”并非绝对配伍禁忌,实为顺应中医辨证思维并带有非常规属性临床用药策略。结论 “十八反”的临床应用须具备明确条件适用性,未来应依托真实世界研究(RWS)与单病例随机交叉试验(N-of-1 Randomized Crossover Trial)提供更高级别循证证据。

关键词: “十八反”, 药物配伍禁忌, 用药禁忌, 中药, 药性

Abstract: Objective To study the connotation of the eighteen incompatible (Shibafan), a core concept of safety of clinical medication in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), construct a modern framework for theoretical interpretation, and provide data for safe medication and in-depth research on compatibility in TCM. Methods The origin and semantic evolution of the character “fan” (incompatibility) were explored via historical textual research and semantic analysis. By combining empirical analysis and systematic evaluation and integrating modern pharmacopeial standards, clinical trials, and basic experimental research, the toxicity-efficacy transformation mechanism of incompatible medicaments under the syndrome microenvironment was analyzed. Results A multidimensional and clinically-applicable decision tree model was established that involved constitution identification, dosage thresholds, and compatibility with adjuvant herbs. Research indicated that the “eighteen incompatible medicaments” were not absolute compatibility contraindications, but rather an unconventional clinical medication regimen that conformed to the dialectical thinking of TCM. Conclusion Clinical applications of the “eighteen incompatible medicaments” are clearly applicable under specific conditions. In the future, real-world studies (RWS) and N-of-1 randomized crossover trials should be leveraged to provide higher-level evidence-based evidence.

Key words: Eighteen Incompatible (Shibafan), Drug Compatibility Contraindications, Medication Contraindications, Trational Chinese Medicine, Medicinal Properties

中图分类号: