中国药物警戒 ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 84-86.

• 法规与管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不良反应损害量化通用指标研究

张金鹏, 石元元, 冯晓远, 王小艺, 王英, 朱文涛*   

  1. 北京中医药大学,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-26 修回日期:2016-03-14 出版日期:2016-02-08 发布日期:2016-03-14
  • 作者简介:张金鹏,男,在读硕士,药物经济学及药品风险控制。

Adverse Drug Reactions General Quantitative Indicator Researches

ZHANG Jin-peng, SHI Yuan-yuan, FENG Xiao-yuan, WANG Xiao-yi, WANG Ying, ZHU Wen-tao*   

  1. College of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2015-11-26 Revised:2016-03-14 Online:2016-02-08 Published:2016-03-14

摘要: 目的分析总结应用于不良反应损害量化的通用指标,探讨各指标适用性及局限性。方法以CNKI、万方、维普等为数据库,检索自2000年至今相关文献,提炼应用于不良反应损害量化的指标。结果应用于不良反应损害量化的指标共有5种,分别为伤残调整生命年、不良反应严重度指数、风险效益比、最小损害量以及质量调整生命年。结论目前应用于不良反应损害量化的指标皆有其自身局限性及适用领域,应通过多种指标共同评价以提高不良反应损害量化科学性。

关键词: 不良反应损害, 量化, 指标

Abstract: ObjectiveTo analyze the applicability and limitation of the general indicators in ADR quantitative assessment researches. MethodsThe related literatures since 2000 in CNKI, WANFANG and VIP databases were searched, and the general indicators in ADR quantitative assessment researches were summarized. ResultsFive indicators in ADR quantitative assessment researches were involved: disability-adjusted life year, severity index of ADR, risk-benefit-ratio, number need to harm and quality-adjusted life year. ConclusionLimitation does exist in each indicator. Indicators can be used cooperatively to improve the scientific level in ADR quantitative assessment researches.

Key words: ADR damage, quantization, indicator

中图分类号: