中国药物警戒 ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (9): 537-539.

• 法规与管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中日医疗器械上市后监管研究

郑立佳, 赵燕*, 董放   

  1. 国家食品药品监督管理总局药品评价中心,北京 100045
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-31 修回日期:2016-10-31 出版日期:2016-09-20 发布日期:2016-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 赵燕,女,硕士,医疗器械不良事件监测。E-mail:zhaoyan@cdr-adr.org.cn

Research on Medical Device’s Post-marketing Surveillance between China and Japan

ZHENG Li-jia, ZHAO Yan*, DONG Fang   

  1. Center for Drug Reevaluation, CFDA, Beijing 100045, China
  • Received:2016-10-31 Revised:2016-10-31 Online:2016-09-20 Published:2016-10-31

摘要: 目的 对比中日医疗器械上市后监管方式,为我国医疗器械上市后监测提供参考。方法 通过对比中日医疗器械监管机构组成、医疗器械不良事件报告制度及流程、不良事件报告的处理,结合目前我国医疗器械监管现状,分析存在不足,并提出建议。结果 目前我国医疗器械上市后监管在法规、企业主体责任意识、使用单位人员能力、公众上报意识方面还存在不足。结论 借鉴日本上市后监管经验,改善我国目前监管过程中存在的不足,促进公众用械安全。

关键词: 中日, 医疗器械, 上市后监管, 研究

Abstract: Objective Comparing medical device’s post-marketing surveillance between China and Japan, to provide reference for the medical device’s post-marketing monitoring in China. Methods Through the comparison between Chinese and Japanese medical device regulatory agency composition, medical device adverse event reporting system and procedures, treatment of medical device adverse event reports, combining with Chinese medical device regulatory status, the existing insufficiencies were analysed, so as to give advices. Results There are still insufficiencies in regulation, corporate responsibility awareness, the ability of hospital personnel, and public awareness. Conclusion By learning the medical device’s post-marketing surveillance in Japan, Chinese current regulation can be improved to promote the public safety of medical device’s use.

Key words: China and Japan, medical device, post-marketing surveillance, research

中图分类号: