中国药物警戒 ›› 2012, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (7): 401-409.

• 政策与法规研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《国家基本药物目录》覆盖疾病实地调研

肖爱丽, 鄢琳, 井春梅*   

  1. 国家食品药品监督管理局药品评价中心,北京 100045
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-29 出版日期:2012-07-10 发布日期:2015-08-07
  • 通讯作者: 井春梅,女,副主任药师,药品安全监测与上市后评价。E-mail:jingchunmei@cdr.gov.cn
  • 作者简介:肖爱丽,女,高级工程师,基本药物监测与评价。

Field Research on the Disease Coverage of "National Essential Medicines List"

XIAO Ai-li, YAN Lin, JING Chun-mei*   

  1. Center for Drug Reevaluation, SFDA, Beijing 100045, China
  • Received:2011-05-29 Online:2012-07-10 Published:2015-08-07

PDF (PC)

294

摘要： 目的了解我国居民常见病、多发病的种类以及疾病谱的特点,将实地调研疾病谱与《国家基本药物目录》覆盖疾病谱进行对比,以期为合理设置基本药物目录类别提供科学依据。方法对我国五省市具有代表性的多家医疗机构进行抽样统计。对14家已建立住院患者电子档案系统的三甲医院,收集并分析了其2008全年出院患者档案数据。对45家社区卫生服务中心和乡镇卫生院,则采用与主要医务人员访谈的方式,对其收治患者的患病情况进行分析。结果与结论 实地调研的疾病谱与《国家基本药物目录》覆盖疾病谱存在较大差异,基本药物目录所覆盖的疾病有待整理与规范。

关键词: 国家基本药物目录, 疾病谱, 实地调研

Abstract: ObjectiveTo understand the varieties of common diseases and frequently encountered diseases among Chinese residents, along with the features of disease coverage, compare the results of this field research with the "National Essential Medicines List"(NEML) in order to provide scientific evidences for a reasonable set of the categories in NEML. MethodsSample survey was conducted at a number of representative medical institutions in five provinces of China. We collected and analyzed the discharged patient record data of the whole year 2008 at fourteen 3A grade hospitals which owned inpatient electronic record system, interviewed the relevant healthcare professionals at 45 community health service centers and township hospitals, understood the diseases involved in the patients there. Resultsand ConclusionThere is a great difference between the disease coverage of field research and that of NEML, so that it's necessary to reconsider and respecify the diseases included by the current NEML.

Key words: National Essential Medicines List, disease coverage, field research