中国药物警戒 ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 301-310.

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

中医药安全性系统综述基于PRISMA Harms清单的案例分析

胡瑞学1, 文玲子1, 于明坤1, 任毅铭2, 曹卉娟1, 高佳琪2, 刘可心2#, 赵璐明2#, 李一琳2#, 林子宜2#, 张子萱2#, 明扬2#, 武雪岑2#, 李迅1, 刘建平1, 费宇彤1,*   

  1. 1 北京中医药大学循证医学中心,北京 100029;
    2 北京中医药大学,北京102488
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-16 修回日期:2019-06-11 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 费宇彤,女,博士,研究员,循证中医药临床研究方法学。E-mail: yutong_fei@163.com
  • 作者简介:胡瑞学,男,硕士,循证中医药临床研究方法学。
    #与第六作者同等贡献。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81830115):基于整体观和辨证论治复杂干预的中医疗效评价关键技术和结局指标研究; 北京中医药大学教育课题(XJZX17005):科研产出型形成性评价方法在临床研究方法教学课程中的应用; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2017-JYB-JS-149):急性下呼吸道感染治疗中中药及抗生素使用情况的处方分析及调查研究

Examples of Traditional Chinese Medicine Safety Systematic Review Based on PRISMA Harms Checklist

HU Ruixue1, WEN Lingzi1, YU Mingkun1, REN Yiming2, CAO Huijuan1, GAO Jiaqi2, LIU Kexin2#, ZHAO Luming2#, LI Yilin2#, LIN Ziyi2#, ZHANG Zixuan2#, MING Yang2#, WU Xuecen2#, LI Xun1, LIU Jianping1, FEI Yutong1,*   

  1. 1 Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, BUCM, Beijing 100029, China;
    2 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China
  • Received:2019-01-16 Revised:2019-06-11 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-06-11

摘要: 目的 采用干预措施安全性系统综述报告规范PRISMA Harms清单,对中医药安全性系统综述的规范报告提供范例。方法 通过计算机检索中国知网、万方数据、维普(VIP)三大中文数据库,提取中医药安全性系统综述的内容,并依据国际上已发表的PRISMA Harms清单对相应条目进行举例说明。结果 共检索到211篇文献,最终纳入符合标准的文献116篇。根据中医药实例的筛选标准,选择出与PRISMA Harms清单报告条目的内容符合、描述较为准确、报告质量较好的文献共25篇,并从中给PRISMA Harms清单的每一个条目选取了1~2条范例。当范例存在明显局限时进行必要的补充说明。结论 本研究通过检索文献列举了中医药安全性系统综述相应部分的实例,可为研究者撰写安全性系统综述提供参考,从而提高安全性系统综述的报告质量。所选取的部分实例报告质量距规范可能仍有差距,可随着最新文献的发表进行补充和替换。

关键词: 中医药, 安全性, 系统综述, PRISMA Harms, 案例

Abstract: Objective To provide examples for TCM safety systematic reviews based on PRISMA Harms checklist. Methods Three Chinese electronic databases (CNKI, WanFang and VIP) were searched from inception to October 2018. TCM safety systematic reviews were identified and extracted. Based on predefined criteria, reviews with contents that best meet the requirement of PRISMA Harms items were selected and provided as examples. One to two examples were provided for each item. Results 116 reviews were included and examples were selected from 25 papers, which were relatively consistent with the requirements of PRISMA Harms checklist items. Supplemental explanations were given when the examples had significant limitations. Conclusion Our study provided examples for the reporting of TCM safety systematic reviews according to PRISMA Harms. Examples were selected from published TCM systematic reviews, and may have limitations. An updated reporting examples will be considered with the publication of better quality systematic reviews.

Key words: traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), safety, systematic review, PRISMA Harms, example

中图分类号: