定性研究方法在药物安全性研究中的应用（一）

中国药物警戒 ›› 2010, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (7): 410-413.

定性研究方法在药物安全性研究中的应用（一）

曹卉娟, 费宇彤, 孙瑛, 刘建平^*

北京中医药大学循证医学中心,北京 100029

收稿日期:2016-02-22 修回日期:2016-02-22 出版日期:2010-07-08 发布日期:2016-02-22
通讯作者: 刘建平,男,教授,循证中医药临床研究。E-mail: liujp@bucm.edu.cn
作者简介:曹卉娟,女,在读博士研究生,循证中医药临床疗效评价。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）课题（2006CB504602）; 科技部国际合作项目（2009DFA31460）

Application of Qualitative Research Methods in the Study of Adverse Drug Reaction(1)

CAO Hui-juan, FEI Yu-tong, SUN Ying, LIU Jian-ping^*

Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029

Received:2016-02-22 Revised:2016-02-22 Online:2010-07-08 Published:2016-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 起源于社会学的定性研究方法已开始应用于药品不良反应的研究。与定量研究方法不同,定性研究主要应用于探讨医务人员和患者的态度、认知、体验和看法等人文社会学的观点和深层次的理解,对于了解药物使用过程中患者对药品不良反应的认识和关心等具有重要意义,可以补充定量研究的不足,为全面、综合地反映药品不良反应,更加安全、合理的用药提供依据。

关键词: 定性研究, 访谈法, 药品不良反应, 认知, 态度, 体验

Abstract: Qualitative research Methods, originated from social science, have been used in research on adverse drug reaction(ADR). Different from quantitative research methodology, qualitative research is mainly used to investigate the attitude, recognition, experience and perspectives from health care workers or patients so to have a better understanding of humanity and opinions. This will be significant for understanding of the knowledge and concerns from patients about ADR. The Results from qualitative research can complement the shortage of quantitative research and reflect the ADR in a more comprehensive way so to provide basis for better safe and rationale use of drugs.

Key words: qualitative research, interview, adverse drug reaction(ADR), recognition, attitude, experience

中图分类号:

R954

曹卉娟, 费宇彤, 孙瑛, 刘建平. 定性研究方法在药物安全性研究中的应用（一）[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2010, 7(7): 410-413.

CAO Hui-juan, FEI Yu-tong, SUN Ying, LIU Jian-ping. Application of Qualitative Research Methods in the Study of Adverse Drug Reaction(1)[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance, 2010, 7(7): 410-413.

参考文献

[1] Scobie S, Thomson R, Mcneil J J, et al. Measurement of the safety and quality of health care[J]. MJA, 2006,184: S51-S55.
[2] Krathwohl, D R. Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach 2nd ed[M]. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher, 1999:1-15.
[3] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000：9-13.
[4] 刘建平主编. 循证中医药定性研究方法学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009：29-118.
[5] Hannan E L, Kilburn H, O’Donnell J F, et al. Adult open heart surgery in New York State: an analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates[J]. JAMA,1990,264: 2768-2774.
[6] 尚鹏辉, 刘佳, 刘继同,等. 利用定性访谈的方法探讨我国药品安全的涵义[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2009,6(9): 522-525.
[7] Phipps D L, Noyce P R, Parker D,et al. Medication safety in community pharmacy: a qualitative study of the sociotechnical context[J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2009, 9:158.
[8] Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006, 4: 79.
[9] Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O,et al. A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids[J]. The Hopeful study. Health Tech- nology Assessment, 2008:12(5):1-248.
[10] 徐晓鸣, 周倩丽. 四川省2017例计划生育药具应用现状和不良反应调查[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2008, 10(156): 607-609.
[11] 甘旻, 傅鹰, 黄丽萍,等. 米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤不良反应中文文献的系统性综述[J].药物流行病学杂志,2001,10(3): 138-141.
[12] Antoine C, Liebens F, Carly B,et al. Safety of hormone therapy after breast cancer: a qualitative systematic review[J]. Human Reproduction, 2007,22(2): 616-622.
[13] Leslie W S, Hankey C R, Lean MEJ. Weight gain as an adverse effect of some commonly prescribed drugs: a systematic review[J]. Q J Med, 2007,100: 395-404.
[14] Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools[EB/OL]. [2010-04-12].http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Linds/Qualitative Appraisal Tool. Pdf.
[15] O’Neill T, Jinks C, Ong B N. Decision-making regarding total knee replacement surgery: A qualitative meta-synthesis[J]. BMC Health Services Research,2007, 7: 52.
[16] Hoddinott P, Pill R. A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice. More methodological questions than answers[J].Family Practice,1997,14(4): 313-319.