中国药物警戒 ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 87-92.
DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.2020.02.05

• 法规与管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

欧美监管部门与公众药品安全风险信息沟通现状研究及启示

吴世福1, 金毅2, 常虹1, 田月洁1, 徐魁3, 许莉莉1, 郭凡岭3, 张景东3   

  1. 1山东省药品不良反应监测中心,山东 济南 250014;
    2山东省血液中心,山东 济南 250000;
    3济宁市药品不良反应与药物滥用监测中心,山东 济宁 272000
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-11 修回日期:2020-06-22 出版日期:2020-02-15 发布日期:2020-02-26
  • 作者简介:吴世福,男,主任药师,药学。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省药品不良反应监测方法系列研究项目(2017SDADRKY02)

Drug Risk Communication in the European Union and United States between Regulators and the Public

WU Shifu1, JIN Yi2, CHANG Hong1, TIAN Yuejie1, XU Kui3, XU Lili1, GUO Fanling3, ZHANG Jingdong3   

  1. 1Shandong Provincial Center for ADR Monitoring, Jinan Shandong 250014, China;
    2The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of TCM, Jinan Shandong 250014, China;
    3Jining Center for ADR and Drug Abuse Monitoring, Jining Shandong 272025, China
  • Received:2019-07-11 Revised:2020-06-22 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-26

摘要: 目的 分析欧美药品安全风险信息沟通现状,为构建我国药品安全风险信息沟通模式提供借鉴。方法 查阅国内外文献,检索药品安全风险信息沟通相关法规,浏览欧美药品监管主管部门官方网站和其他网站,了解欧美药品安全风险信息沟通机构和法规、内容和时机、方式和效果等内容,对比我国药品安全风险信息沟通情况,提出思考和建议。结果 药品安全风险信息沟通是药品风险控制的重要环节,欧美较早意识到风险信息沟通的重要性,构建了较完善的风险信息沟通体系,为达到沟通效果,采用了形式灵活多样的沟通方法,并在实践过程中逐步加强。分析发现,加强与公众的信息沟通是国家药品监管的基本手段;与公众信息沟通的方式趋于多样化、便利化、信息化、针对性;药品安全信息流向具有双向性。结论 应进一步重视风险信息沟通在药品风险管理中的作用,完善沟通制度,构建沟通机制,分享沟通方法,并开展沟通效果评估。

关键词: 药品, 风险信息沟通, 欧美, 模式

Abstract: Objective To make recommendations for the construction of China's model for drug safety risk communication by analyzing the current drug risk communication in the European Union and United States. Methods By consulting domestic and foreign literature, retrieving relevant regulations on drug safety risk information exchange, browsing the official websites of drug regulatory authorities and other websites, we harvested information on exchange institutions and regulations, contents, timing, methods and effects of such information exchange in the European Union and United States before we made a comparison with China. Results Literature research showed that drug risk communication was an important part of drug risk control. Europe and the United States became aware of the importance of risk communication long ago and built a better risk communication system. In order to achieve a better effect, flexible and diverse communication methods were adopted and improved. This analysis found that strengthening information exchange with the public was the basic means of national drug supervision. The ways of communicating with the public are to be diversified, facilitated, informatized and targeted, and there should be a two-way flow of drug safety information. Conclusion More attention should be paid to the role of risk information exchange in drug risk management. The systems, mechanisms and methods for such communication should be made more accessible, and results of communication should be evaluated.

Key words: drug, risk communication, Europe and America, mode

中图分类号: